I am currently feeding my baby US made Enfamil Lipil produced in the US because I thought I could get away from this Melamine issue. I read a couple of articles recently on traces of melamine or it's byproduct in US made infant formula. Many articles and reports say that traces are not harmful etc, but if I had a choice to give my baby formula that contains NO melamine or cyanuric acid, why wouldn't I?
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081126/...fant_formula_6
The HK government has a spreadsheet as to which local formula they tested and found "satisfactory". What does this mean? Does satisfactory mean it's under the 1 part per million safety limit? I emailed the FEHD in HK for clarification, but haven't gotten any response from them. In addition, I asked my Paediatrician about changing formulas, but he told me the Mead Johnson issued a statement that said their Enfamil Lipil contains no Melamine, but it doesn't mention anything about cyanuric acid. So today, I just told my doctor to help me find another formula and he recommended Similac Advance.
Now Similac Advance tested a small amount of melamine in their own test labs. I don't know if this only pertains to Similac produced in the US.
I am in the process of switching over from Enfamil Lipil to Similac Advance Stage one produced in Spain and tested locally in HK.
THere is such a lack of information available, I don't know what to do.
My questions are:
-What does "satisfactory" mean? Did the govt test for cyanuric acid too?
-Does Similac Advance in HK have ANY melamine or cyanuric acid at all?
-Plus what are you all feeding your babies?