Forums  •  Classifieds  •  Events  •  Directory

 

Which due date should I go with?

  1. #1
    babyat23 is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    HK
    Posts
    47

    Which due date should I go with?

    According to my LMP (which I'm very sure of) my baby's due date is on Feb 9th.

    My 12 weeks ultrasound said Feb 15th, but subsequent ultrasounds showed Feb 9th (same as my LMP).

    I know it's a few days' difference, but which date is more accurate?

  2. #2
    carang's Avatar
    carang is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Sai Kung
    Posts
    6,259
    i would say your LMP.

    i KNEW when mine was, but BOTH of my babies measured at least 2 weeks smaller than that. i had arguments with some intern dr's over it. it is perfectly possible that the baby is measuring larger for the age.

    it should also be kept in mind that their measurements are AVERAGES.

  3. #3
    banane76 is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Hong Kong
    Posts
    478
    LMP for sure. The ultrasounds like Carang says are just averages.

  4. #4
    geomum is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Hong Kong
    Posts
    719
    Doesn't matter, only 5% babies are born on their due date.

  5. #5
    beckveldman is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Discovery Bay
    Posts
    51
    Depends on who did the ultrasounds, but actually, I would tend to go with 12 week ultrasound as the more accurate predictor of those you mention.

    LMP method assumes you have an "average" length luteal phase, whereas in fact this varies by +/- 2 days amongst individuals.

    In early ultrasounds where the fetus is still quite small the variations in size amongst individuals are also not great, so it's actually a very good indicator. An earlier 7 week ultrasound would be generally an even better predictor.

    Ultrasounds later in pregnancy show more variation in length and sizing of the baby in utero due to usual difference amongst the population, so you wouldn't tend to change your estimate of due date on those.

  6. #6
    KathyKitzis is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Hong Kong
    Posts
    27
    I would go with your LMP. I my case, I had IVF and had twins so knew exactly when fertilization took place and the scans sometimes had them with two weeks difference and weeks off the actual due date. Scans are not 100% accurate. Go with your feeling.

  7. #7
    geomum is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Hong Kong
    Posts
    719
    Actually according to LMP my EDD should be 1st March but since day one my OB has told me that my EDD is 8th March seeing the size of the baby perhaps???

  8. #8
    Gataloca's Avatar
    Gataloca is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    TKO
    Posts
    643
    Agree with beckveldman. LPM works only is you have the average 28 day period cycle, with ovulation on cd 14, and luteal phase of 14 days. Mostly people don't have that (At least I don't.. Although this time I did ovulate on cd 14 thanks to Clomid)

    And also, early scan can give you a better estimate of your due date, as all babies grow in the same rate at first. Later it is hard to predict, as babies grow on their own rate.

Similar Threads

  1. Where to go on a date w/ hubby?
    By ctrbabe1 in forum Everything Else
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 04-02-2011, 11:39 PM
  2. October due date
    By bb4us in forum Babies Born in 2010
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 09-07-2010, 12:56 PM
  3. Would you induce before due date?
    By mumsy in forum Hong Kong Pregnancy Forum
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 12-20-2009, 07:21 PM
  4. Lunch date?
    By PregnantHK in forum Babies Born in 2008
    Replies: 37
    Last Post: 07-28-2008, 07:47 PM
  5. How to estimate due date?
    By joy joy in forum Babies Born in 2007
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 10-24-2006, 10:37 AM
Scroll to top